Longevity Next

Intervention

Cocoa extract

Source-reviewed Last reviewed: 2026-10-13

Research Observatory

Evidence Update

Current evidence

Cocoa extract supplying 500 mg/day flavanols was compared with placebo in COSMOS, including cognitive outcomes in 2,262 COSMOS-Mind participants and cardiovascular outcomes in the 21,442-person parent trial. The multivitamin assignment is separate within the factorial design. COSMOS cocoa extract did not significantly improve the prespecified cognitive or total cardiovascular primary outcomes; favorable secondary cardiovascular mortality is not a positive trial-wide verdict.

What changed

Cocoa extract did not meet the selected cognitive or total cardiovascular primary endpoints; cardiovascular-mortality and per-protocol signals remain secondary context.

What did not change

Small score shifts or age-equivalent calibrations are not demonstrated rejuvenation.

Why it matters

Separates ingredient attribution, endpoint hierarchy and participant denominators.

Main limitation

Supplement is not ordinary chocolate; secondary and per-protocol analyses cannot silently replace intention-to-treat primary outcome.

Next proof

Confirm clinical signal independently with prespecified hierarchy.

Summary

Cocoa extract supplying 500 mg/day flavanols was compared with placebo in COSMOS, including cognitive outcomes in 2,262 COSMOS-Mind participants and cardiovascular outcomes in the 21,442-person parent trial. The multivitamin assignment is separate within the factorial design. COSMOS cocoa extract did not significantly improve the prespecified cognitive or total cardiovascular primary outcomes; favorable secondary cardiovascular mortality is not a positive trial-wide verdict.

Intelligence Take

Separates ingredient attribution, endpoint hierarchy and participant denominators.

Limitations

Supplement is not ordinary chocolate; secondary and per-protocol analyses cannot silently replace intention-to-treat primary outcome.

Opens in a new tab